Four Years of Documented Public-Interest Advocacy
Over the final four years of his service, one Dallas ISD educator documented and brought forward evidence of district misconduct involving:
-
Alleged Title VII violations based on race, national origin, and ethnicity;
-
Systemic noncompliance with Texas Family Code mandatory reporting requirements (§ 261.101, §261.102, and §261.104);
-
The alleged weaponization of unverified student allegations without lawful CPS reporting or confirmation;
-
The use of CPS confidentiality to advance disciplinary outcomes, including circumstances that exposed students and families to libel litigation and to shield administrative actions from scrutiny; and
-
Sustained enforcement inaction under Texas Family Code § 261.109 by Dallas ISD leadership and the Texas Education Agency despite notice.
These efforts began as exercises of due process rights and evolved to promote statutory compliance, protect students and families, preserve educator rights, and restore honesty, transparency, oversight, and accountability within public education governance.
Parents should ask a simple question: If this system failed here, how would I know it hasn’t failed elsewhere? Teachers should ask: What protections exist if due process depends on institutional goodwill? Taxpayers should ask: Why do oversight agencies exist if their refusal to act carries no accountability? And lawmakers should ask the most important question of all: What incentive does any institution have to follow the law if silence is rewarded?
It is my sincere desire that as you read these pages and evidence findings trigger an emotional response, that you will also access the CONTACTS menu and select those needing to hear your comments. Because if the gained knowledge and understanding of what transpired is not shared to right the wrongs, then nothing will change.